This past week I gave two presentations on my book, Evangelicalism and the Decline of American Politics.
What is more, I did so in the heart of where evangelicals live, my hometown of Lynchburg, Virginia.
In one of the sessions a man insisted the real problem in politics is “judicial activism,” not partisan evangelicalism. Later he continued his argument in emails to me.
It’s a curious phrase – judicial activism – one I would argue is empty of any substantive meaning.
Liking or disliking Supreme Court rulings is little more than beauty being in the eyes of the beholder. When the Court makes decisions evangelicals don’t like, they call it judicial activism. When the decisions go their way they call it upholding moral values.
Since the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the responsibility for deciding constitutional issues, evangelicals are not only fighting decisions the Court makes, but the role of the Court itself.
Apparently they don’t like our system of government.
Perhaps that is why they are trying to undermine it by persuading Republican controlled state legislatures to circumvent Supreme Court rulings by attacking them through the back door.
On issues such as gay marriage, prayer in schools, and especially abortion rights, evangelicals have been busy persuading these states to pass laws whose practical effect is to negate Court decisions they don’t like.
So called TRAP laws (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers), for example, that require rural doctors to have admitting privileges at far away hospitals, demand Planned Parenthood clinics to meet hospital standards that don’t apply to other clinics, or impose an unnecessary 48 hour waiting period between seeing a doctor and having an abortion.
Evangelicals have also pushed Republican states to pass laws that designate only one county clerk who can issue a marriage license to gay couples and then officials often reduce the time that person is available, or mandating the teaching of “creation science” that undermines the ability of school systems to maintain the integrity of biology courses.
Most of these proposals that have become law have been found unconstitutional, but evangelicals justify what they are doing by claiming they are standing with the majority of Americans against “activist justices.”
They are wrong.
In my book I cite one survey after another that show evangelicals hold minority views on these issues. Ninety percent of Americans, to cite one example, support a woman’s right to have an abortion in all or most circumstances (Pew Research Center).
The reason evangelicals do what they do is because they believe the country should follow what the Bible says. The majority of Americans want the country to follow the Constitution.
Now that Trump is President, however, they have an strong ally in the White House.
Not that he cares what the Bible says. He cares only about what he says, but he is quite willing to throw them crumbs from his table in order keep their support.
That doesn’t bother evangelicals since Trump has promised to make America great again, and they are sure that will include his support of their efforts to legislate and/or adjudicate their moral agenda.
What makes matters worse is the fact that God gets blamed for what evangelicals are trying to do every time they say they are doing God’s will.
But the basic problem with evangelicals is they ignore the fact that America is not a theocracy, and most Americans want to keep it that way.
Being a democracy is precisely why the religious convictions of our founders are irrelevant in regard to the role religion (read Christianity) plays in American society.
They believed in God, and some were Christians. They could have established Christianity as the nation’s official religion, but chose not to do so.
That is a stunning fact of history, but evangelicals treat it as if it doesn’t matter.
It does matter, a fact the rest of us cannot ignore, especially with Donald Trump in the White House.
Christianity has a long history of certain manifestations of it speaking and acting in ways that have divided people and nations, doing more harm than good.
I believe we are facing such a time right now in our own country, and risk everything we cherish as Americans and as Christians if we fail to realize just how serious the threat is.
Jan, good to hear and see you again last week. Since Trump came to LU and tried to quote “One Corinthians” we’ve had a couple of readers in my Church use “One Corinthians” and last Sunday “One John”. I had always head it as “First Corinthians” until Trump came and this change grates on me. You’re the Theologian, am I wrong?
Thanks, Bob Flint
Bob, you are not wrong. Trump’s “one Corinthians” comment showed ignorance of the traditional way it is phrased, the same way you would say “first and second place.” No one would say, “one and two place,” and no one should say “one and two Corinthians. Why someone in your church would escapes me. They are simply replicating Trump’s biblical ignorance. Maybe someone should tell them???
I will speak to them about this.
Thanks!
Jan, I thing evangelicals would also claim honesty as an important characteristic of being a Christian and yet their claims that these TRAP laws are about concern for the mother is, in my opinion, tremendously dishonest.
On a different note, I appreciate the importance of the Supreme Court. For me that reinforces the idea that elections matter and people need to vote. I would admit though to some discomfort when 1 lower court judge is able to affect national policy. I didn’t like it when it happened to President Obama and much as I agree with rulings that oppose President Trump, I’m uneasy with it. Ultimately I guess the issue at hand leads back to the Supreme Court and thus the system is sound.
Wilbur, I think the price we pay for citizenship in a democracy like ours that is unlike any other in the world is having to accept judicial decisions we don’t like. The good thing is that news cases often raise the same issues and sometimes bad decisions get corrected. Dred Scott is a good example. Otherwise, we have to change the system, and while I sometimes think we need to, it has to be orderly, constitutional. But, so far as I can see, it is never going to happen. Thanks.
Thank you, Jan. I always enjoy your thoughtful and insightful posts, as well as your book. Keep up the fight!
Sent from my iPad
>
Thanks, Gene. I will and I am sure you will, too. We all must. Today’s tragedy makes it very clear that our country is in so much trouble on so many fronts. We cannot let it all overwhelm us. It has to make us more determined to do something to change the direction we are headed.
Jan,
This is excellent. It is clear to me that the evangelicals do not see the same God I grew up with, nor do they understand the Founders erecting a religious-neutral State. The Founders were so serious about the issue that they devoted half a day to debate whether to invite the deity in the Preamble, then voted to invoke “We, the People . . . “ as the sovereign authority in governmental matters.
Cheerz
Gene
Gene, it seems evangelicals deliberately ignore the actual history of how the founders forged the incredible Constitution we have. Thanks for underscoring the truth they refuse to accept.